Anyone who Believes Facebook should Pick which Asserts by These\ncalls is for Facebook to create these calls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Our approach is consistent with companies like YouTube and\nTwitter. And broadcasters are required by national law to not censor candidate\nadvertisements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In fact, the ad that touched off this debate conducted\nnearly 1,000 times on local TV channels in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and\nSouth Carolina.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So if people have a Issue with Facebook’s coverage, they<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Highly scrutinized; it is a good thing. But for it to take\nplace, the people and the news media have to watch it. In fact, if Facebook\nbecame the gatekeeper of truth, the very first people to complain would be\nthose who are complaining today — for good reason.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Our policies don’t imply that politicians could say anything\nThey need. They can’t spread misinformation about where, when or how to vote,\nas an example, or articles which dangers impending harm or incites violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In other words, contrary to a lot of this criticism, it’s\nnot anything goes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Perhaps most seriously, some state Facebook is allowing Its\nstage to be overtaken by the kind of misinformation efforts we remember from\n2016. We disagree. Foreign interference and fake accounts are an intrusion into\nthe electoral process that we’ve been aggressively fighting for three years.\nAnother is content created by political judges, that must put their name on\neverything they say.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We realize not everyone agrees with our choice, and we\nWelcome that argument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Katie Harbath is Facebook’s public policy director, global elections. Nell McCarthy is your organization’s manager of policy management. If you can’t find this reader poll, please refresh your webpage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Anyone who Believes Facebook should Pick which Asserts by These\ncalls is for Facebook to create these calls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Our approach is consistent with companies like YouTube and\nTwitter. And broadcasters are required by national law to not censor candidate\nadvertisements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In fact, the ad that touched off this debate conducted\nnearly 1,000 times on local TV channels in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and\nSouth Carolina.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So if people have a Issue with Facebook’s coverage, they<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Highly scrutinized; it is a good thing. But for it to take\nplace, the people and the news media have to watch it. In fact, if Facebook\nbecame the gatekeeper of truth, the very first people to complain would be\nthose who are complaining today — for good reason.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Our policies don’t imply that politicians could say anything\nThey need. They can’t spread misinformation about where, when or how to vote,\nas an example, or articles which dangers impending harm or incites violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In other words, contrary to a lot of this criticism, it’s\nnot anything goes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Perhaps most seriously, some state Facebook is allowing Its\nstage to be overtaken by the kind of misinformation efforts we remember from\n2016. We disagree. Foreign interference and fake accounts are an intrusion into\nthe electoral process that we’ve been aggressively fighting for three years.\nAnother is content created by political judges, that must put their name on\neverything they say.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We realize not everyone agrees with our choice, and we\nWelcome that argument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Katie Harbath is Facebook’s public policy director, global elections. Nell McCarthy is your organization’s manager of policy management. If you can’t find this reader poll, please refresh your webpage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Anyone who Believes Facebook should Pick which Asserts by These\ncalls is for Facebook to create these calls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Our approach is consistent with companies like YouTube and\nTwitter. And broadcasters are required by national law to not censor candidate\nadvertisements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In fact, the ad that touched off this debate conducted\nnearly 1,000 times on local TV channels in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and\nSouth Carolina.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So if people have a Issue with Facebook’s coverage, they<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Highly scrutinized; it is a good thing. But for it to take\nplace, the people and the news media have to watch it. In fact, if Facebook\nbecame the gatekeeper of truth, the very first people to complain would be\nthose who are complaining today — for good reason.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Our policies don’t imply that politicians could say anything\nThey need. They can’t spread misinformation about where, when or how to vote,\nas an example, or articles which dangers impending harm or incites violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In other words, contrary to a lot of this criticism, it’s\nnot anything goes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Perhaps most seriously, some state Facebook is allowing Its\nstage to be overtaken by the kind of misinformation efforts we remember from\n2016. We disagree. Foreign interference and fake accounts are an intrusion into\nthe electoral process that we’ve been aggressively fighting for three years.\nAnother is content created by political judges, that must put their name on\neverything they say.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We realize not everyone agrees with our choice, and we\nWelcome that argument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Katie Harbath is Facebook’s public policy director, global\nelections. Nell McCarthy is your organization’s manager of policy management. If\nyou can’t find this reader poll, please refresh your webpage.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Anyone who Believes Facebook should Pick which Asserts by These calls is for Facebook to create these calls. Our approach is consistent with companies like YouTube and Twitter. And broadcasters are required by national law to not censor candidate advertisements. In fact, the ad that touched off this debate conducted nearly 1,000 times on local …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":544,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[22,29,48,76],"yoast_head":"\n